Evaluating Government Policies to Enhance the Quality of Basic Education in Urban Areas
Keywords:
Educational Policy, Urban Education, Equity, Teacher Development, Student OutcomesAbstract
This research evaluates government policies aimed at improving the quality of basic education in urban areas, focusing on their effectiveness and impact on student outcomes. Through a mixed-methods approach, the study analyzes quantitative data from standardized test scores, attendance records, and teacher quality metrics, alongside qualitative insights from stakeholder interviews and focus groups. The findings reveal significant positive correlations between increased funding, professional development for teachers, and enhanced curriculum relevance with improved student performance and engagement. However, the evaluation also highlights persistent challenges, including inequities in resource distribution, high teacher turnover rates, and limited access to technology, which continue to hinder educational equity. The study underscores the need for comprehensive, multifaceted strategies that address systemic barriers and promote equitable educational opportunities for all students. Recommendations include sustained investment in urban education, enhanced support systems for teachers, and strengthened community partnerships. By integrating insights from this evaluation with existing literature, the research contributes to the ongoing discourse on effective educational reform in urban settings, emphasizing the importance of collaborative efforts to create an inclusive and high-quality educational environment for all learners.
References
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press.
Akar, H. (2010). Challenges for schools in communities with internal migration flows: evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(3), 263–276.
Basch, C. E. (2011). Healthier students are better learners: A missing link in school reforms to close the achievement gap. Journal of School Health, 81(10), 593–598.
Blandford, A. E. (2013). Semi-structured qualitative studies. Interaction Design Foundation.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Council, N. R., Behavioral, D. of, Sciences, S., Education, C. for, & States, C. on the S. of T. P. P. in the U. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. National Academies Press.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Cook-Harvey, C. M. (2018). Educating the Whole Child: Improving School Climate to Support Student Success. Learning Policy Institute.
Dick-Sagoe, C. (2020). Decentralization for improving the provision of public services in developing countries: A critical review. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1804036.
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435.
Freeman, C., & Tranter, P. (2012). Children and their urban environment: Changing worlds. Routledge.
Glewwe, P. W., Hanushek, E. A., Humpage, S. D., & Ravina, R. (2011). School resources and educational outcomes in developing countries: A review of the literature from 1990 to 2010.
Harber, C., & Davies, L. (2005). School management and effectiveness in developing countries: The post-bureaucratic school. A&C Black.
Jhurree, V. (2005). Technology integration in education in developing countries: Guidelines to policy makers. International Education Journal, 6(4), 467–483.
Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system: a handbook for development practitioners. World Bank Publications.
Lewis, A. D., Huebner, E. S., Malone, P. S., & Valois, R. F. (2011). Life satisfaction and student engagement in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 249–262.
Mbwesa, J. K. (2014). Students’ Perceived Quality of Distance Education Courses as a Correlate of Learner Satisfaction: A Case Study of the Bachelor of Education Arts Program, University of Nairobi, Kenya. Int’l J. Soc. Sci. Stud., 2, 86.
Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J., & Thomas, J. (2014). A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 1–12.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 474–498.
Rutakumwa, R., Mugisha, J. O., Bernays, S., Kabunga, E., Tumwekwase, G., Mbonye, M., & Seeley, J. (2020). Conducting in-depth interviews with and without voice recorders: a comparative analysis. Qualitative Research, 20(5), 565–581.
Schauer, M. M. (2018). “Vygotsky for the Hood”: Connecting teacher prior life experiences and university teacher preparation curriculums for service in urban schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 1–9.
Smetana, A. L. (2020). Transformative Responsiveness and School Leadership: A mixed-method approach toward closing academic achievement gaps.
Warren, M. (2005). Communities and schools: A new view of urban education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 75(2), 133–173.
Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 469–479.
Xu, A., Baysari, M. T., Stocker, S. L., Leow, L. J., Day, R. O., & Carland, J. E. (2020). Researchers’ views on, and experiences with, the requirement to obtain informed consent in research involving human participants: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics, 21, 1–11.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Henri Nathan, Thalia Melda Saputri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
