Environmental Management Policy Analysis in the Context of Sustainable Development
Keywords:
Environmental Management, Sustainable Development, Policy Effectiveness, Stakeholder Engagement, Adaptive ManagementAbstract
This research examines environmental management policies within the framework of sustainable development, aiming to assess their effectiveness and implications for future practices. Through a comprehensive analysis of case studies from diverse geographical contexts, the study identifies key elements that contribute to successful environmental governance, including robust regulatory frameworks, active stakeholder engagement, and the integration of economic considerations with environmental objectives. The findings reveal that effective policies are characterized by inclusivity and adaptability, allowing for flexibility in response to emerging environmental challenges. Additionally, the research highlights the critical role of technology in enhancing monitoring and participation, empowering communities, and fostering accountability in policy implementation. By reinforcing the interconnectedness of environmental health and socio-economic progress, this study advocates for holistic approaches that align local actions with global sustainability goals. The insights generated from this analysis contribute to the ongoing discourse on sustainable development, offering a roadmap for policymakers to design and implement more effective environmental management strategies that promote resilience, equity, and stewardship in the face of pressing ecological challenges.
References
Adams, B. (2008). Green development: Environment and sustainability in a developing world. Routledge.
Alshuwaikhat, H. M., & Abubakar, I. (2008). An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: assessment of the current campus environmental management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(16), 1777–1785.
Anderies, J. M., Folke, C., Walker, B., & Ostrom, E. (2013). Aligning key concepts for global change policy: robustness, resilience, and sustainability. Ecology and Society, 18(2).
Chen, X., de Vries, S., Assmuth, T., Dick, J., Hermans, T., Hertel, O., Jensen, A., Jones, L., Kabisch, S., & Lanki, T. (2019). Research challenges for cultural ecosystem services and public health in (peri-) urban environments. Science of the Total Environment, 651, 2118–2129.
Clarke, A. H. (2002). Understanding sustainable development in the context of other emergent environmental perspectives. Policy Sciences, 35(1), 69–90.
Concannon, T. W., Fuster, M., Saunders, T., Patel, K., Wong, J. B., Leslie, L. K., & Lau, J. (2014). A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 29, 1692–1701.
Corvalan, C., Hales, S., & McMichael, A. J. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: health synthesis. World Health Organization.
Crow, G., Wiles, R., Heath, S., & Charles, V. (2006). Research ethics and data quality: The implications of informed consent. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(2), 83–95.
Fazey, I., Evely, A. C., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Kruijsen, J., White, P. C. L., Newsham, A., Jin, L., Cortazzi, M., & Phillipson, J. (2013). Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management. Environmental Conservation, 40(1), 19–36.
Galpin, T., Whitttington, J. L., & Bell, G. (2015). Is your sustainability strategy sustainable? Creating a culture of sustainability. Corporate Governance, 15(1), 1–17.
Gonzalez-Zapata, F., & Heeks, R. (2015). The multiple meanings of open government data: Understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 441–452.
Gray, W. B., & Shimshack, J. P. (2011). The effectiveness of environmental monitoring and enforcement: A review of the empirical evidence. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.
Heyes, A. (2000). Implementing environmental regulation: enforcement and compliance. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 17(2), 107–129.
Hupe, P., & Buffat, A. (2014). A public service gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4), 548–569.
Kasimbu, J. M. (2007). The Extent of Stakeholder Involvement in Strategy Formulation Among Non Governmental Organizations Within Nairobi. University of Nairobi.
Molina‐Azorín, J. F., & López‐Gamero, M. D. (2016). Mixed methods studies in environmental management research: Prevalence, purposes and designs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(2), 134–148.
Moynihan, D., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69.
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431.
Sachs, J. D. (2012). From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. The Lancet, 379(9832), 2206–2211.
Singh, P. K., & Chudasama, H. (2020). Evaluating poverty alleviation strategies in a developing country. PloS One, 15(1), e0227176.
Sterner, T., & Coria, J. (2013). Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management. Routledge.
Vanclay, F., Baines, J. T., & Taylor, C. N. (2013). Principles for ethical research involving humans: ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part I. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31(4), 243–253.
Varvasovszky, Z., & Brugha, R. (2000). A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 338–345.
Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037–1047.
Wiltsey Stirman, S., Kimberly, J., Cook, N., Calloway, A., Castro, F., & Charns, M. (2012). The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implementation Science, 7, 1–19.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Merlin Geanisha, Ruth Anastasya Depari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
