Implementation of Decentralization Policy in Improving Public Health Services in Urban Areas
Keywords:
Decentralization policy, Public health services, Urban healthcare, Governance, Digital healthAbstract
Decentralization has become a key policy approach for improving public health services by granting local governments greater autonomy in decision-making and resource allocation. This research examines the implementation of decentralization policy in enhancing healthcare services in urban areas, analyzing its benefits, challenges, and impact on governance efficiency. Using a mixed-methods approach, including policy analysis, case studies, and stakeholder interviews, the study evaluates the effectiveness of decentralized healthcare systems in addressing urban health disparities. The findings reveal that decentralization improves service accessibility, responsiveness, and efficiency by allowing municipal authorities to tailor healthcare initiatives to local needs. Additionally, the integration of digital health technologies, such as telemedicine and electronic health records, has strengthened decentralized healthcare delivery. However, financial disparities between municipalities, weak intergovernmental coordination, and inconsistencies in crisis response pose significant challenges to policy effectiveness. Comparing these results with previous research, this study confirms decentralization’s role in improving healthcare outcomes while highlighting the need for stronger fiscal redistribution mechanisms, enhanced governance structures, and digital health integration. To optimize decentralized healthcare governance, the study recommends targeted financial support for underfunded areas, improved coordination between national and local health agencies, and the expansion of technology-driven healthcare solutions. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on decentralized governance by providing policy-oriented solutions to enhance healthcare equity and efficiency in urban settings. Future research should explore long-term policy impacts and innovative strategies to address persistent challenges in decentralized healthcare systems.
References
Abimbola, S., Baatiema, L., & Bigdeli, M. (2019). The impacts of decentralization on health system equity, efficiency and resilience: a realist synthesis of the evidence. Health Policy and Planning, 34(8), 605–617.
Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2006). Decentralization and local governance in developing countries: A comparative perspective. MIT press.
Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2002). Moving from excellence models of local service delivery to benchmarking ‘good local governance.’ International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68(1), 9–24.
Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, D. A. (2007). Decentralizing governance: emerging concepts and practices.
Development, W. H. O. C. for H. (2010). Hidden cities: unmasking and overcoming health inequities in urban settings. World Health Organization.
Dwicaksono, A., & Fox, A. M. (2018). Does decentralization improve health system performance and outcomes in low‐and middle‐income countries? A systematic review of evidence from quantitative studies. The Milbank Quarterly, 96(2), 323–368.
Gupta, M. Das, Gauri, V., & Khemani, S. (2003). Decentralized Delivery of Primary Health Services in Nigeria. Africa Region Human Development Working Paper Series Washington, DC, The World Bank.
Haque, M. S. (2001). The diminishing publicness of public service under the current mode of governance. Public Administration Review, 61(1), 65–82.
Helling, A. L., Berthet, R. S., & Warren, D. (2005). Linking community empowerment, decentralized governance, and public service provision through a local development framework (Vol. 535). Citeseer.
Hersh, R. H., Bundick, M., Keeling, R., Keyes, C., Kurpius, A., Shavelson, R., Silverman, D., & Swaner, L. (2009). A well-rounded education for a flat world. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 50–53.
Hutchcroft, P. D. (2001). Centralization and decentralization in administration and politics: assessing territorial dimensions of authority and power. Governance, 14(1), 23–53.
Khaleghian, P. (2004). Decentralization and public services: the case of immunization. Social Science & Medicine, 59(1), 163–183.
Liwanag, H. J., & Wyss, K. (2020). Who should decide for local health services? A mixed methods study of preferences for decision-making in the decentralized Philippine health system. BMC Health Services Research, 20, 1–13.
Maphumulo, W. T., & Bhengu, B. R. (2019). Challenges of quality improvement in the healthcare of South Africa post-apartheid: A critical review. Curationis, 42(1), 1–9.
Martínez‐Vázquez, J., Lago‐Peñas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2017). The impact of fiscal decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 1095–1129.
Organization, W. H. (2010). Why urban health matters. World Health Organization.
Panda, B., & Thakur, H. P. (2016). Decentralization and health system performance–a focused review of dimensions, difficulties, and derivatives in India. BMC Health Services Research, 16, 1–14.
Robinson, M. (2007). Does decentralisation improve equity and efficiency in public service delivery provision? IDS Bulletin, 38(1), 7–17.
Shah, A. (2004). Fiscal decentralization in developing and transition economies: progress, problems, and the promise (Vol. 3282). World Bank Publications.
Smoke, P. (2015). Rethinking decentralization: Assessing challenges to a popular public sector reform. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 97–112.
Vartanian, T. P. (2010). Secondary data analysis. Oxford University Press.
Vlahov, D., Freudenberg, N., Proietti, F., Ompad, D., Quinn, A., Nandi, V., & Galea, S. (2007). Urban as a determinant of health. Journal of Urban Health, 84, 16–26.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Suci Anastasya, Arif Rahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
