Evaluating the Impact of Digital Transformation Policies on Transparency and Accountability in Public Governance

Authors

  • Reva Amelia Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (STISIP) Banten Raya, Indonesia

Keywords:

Digital Transformation, E-Government, Public Transparency, Accountability, Policy Implementation

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has encouraged governments to adopt digital transformation policies aimed at improving governance, particularly in terms of transparency and accountability. However, the extent to which these policies achieve their intended outcomes remains a subject of debate, especially in developing countries. This study aims to analyze the impact of government digital transformation policies on public transparency and accountability, as well as to identify the factors influencing their effectiveness. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative techniques such as case studies, interviews, and policy analysis with quantitative methods, including public perception surveys and statistical analysis. The findings reveal that digital transformation policies contribute positively to improving transparency by increasing access to government information and enhancing accountability through better monitoring and reporting systems. Nevertheless, these improvements are not fully optimal, as challenges related to data quality, digital literacy, infrastructure limitations, and low public participation persist. The study also identifies a significant gap between policy design and implementation, indicating that digital initiatives often achieve procedural rather than substantive outcomes. In conclusion, while digital transformation policies have strong potential to enhance governance, their effectiveness is highly dependent on institutional readiness, technological capacity, and social engagement. Therefore, a comprehensive and integrated approach is necessary to ensure that digital transformation leads to meaningful and sustainable improvements in public transparency and accountability.

References

Al-araibi, A. A. M., Naz’ri bin Mahrin, M., Yusoff, R. C. M., & Chuprat, S. B. (2019). A model for technological aspect of e-learning readiness in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1395–1431.

Aminah, S., & Saksono, H. (2021). Digital transformation of the government: A case study in Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(2), 272–288.

Amis, J. M., & Aïssaoui, R. (2013). Readiness for change: An institutional perspective. Journal of Change Management, 13(1), 69–95.

Calista, D. J., & Melitski, J. (2007). E-government and e-governance: Converging constructs of public sector information and communications technologies. Public Administration Quarterly, 87–120.

Carlitz, R. (2013). Improving transparency and accountability in the budget process: An assessment of recent initiatives. Development Policy Review, 31, s49–s67.

Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815.

Eide, M. (2016). Digital transparency and accountability. In The Routledge companion to digital journalism studies (pp. 253–262). Routledge.

Green, A. E., & Aarons, G. A. (2011). A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mapping. Implementation Science, 6(1), 104.

Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197.

Hanna, N. K. (2016). Mastering digital transformation: Towards a smarter society, economy, city and nation. Emerald Group Publishing.

Herbert, L. (2017). Digital transformation: Build your organization’s future for the innovation age. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Junginger, S. (2013). Design and innovation in the public sector: Matters of design in policy-making and policy implementation. Annual Review of Policy Design, 1(1), 1–11.

Karjalainen, K., & Kemppainen, K. (2008). The involvement of small-and medium-sized enterprises in public procurement: Impact of resource perceptions, electronic systems and enterprise size. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14(4), 230–240.

Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (2010). Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. “ O’Reilly Media, Inc.”

Lindquist, E. A., & Huse, I. (2017). Accountability and monitoring government in the digital era: Promise, realism and research for digital‐era governance. Canadian Public Administration, 60(4), 627–656.

Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., Poinsatte-Jones, K., & Florin, M.-V. (2018). Governance strategies for a sustainable digital world. Sustainability, 10(2), 440.

Meyerhoff Nielsen, M., & Jordanoski, Z. (2020). Digital transformation, governance and coordination models: A comparative study of Australia, Denmark and the Republic of Korea. Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 285–293.

Milakovich, M. E. (2012). Digital governance: New technologies for improving public service and participation. Routledge.

Moon, M. D. (2019). Triangulation: A method to increase validity, reliability, and legitimation in clinical research. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 45(1), 103–105.

Moon, M. J. (2003). Can IT help government to restore public trust? Declining public trust and potential prospects of IT in the public sector. 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of The, 8-pp.

Sarker, M. N. I., Wu, M., & Hossin, M. A. (2018). Smart governance through bigdata: Digital transformation of public agencies. 2018 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD), 62–70.

Sharipov, F. F., Chekmenev, D. S., & Gevorgyan, A. A. (2019). Constructing the Reactions of the Socio-political Space to the Process of Making the Most Important State Decisions in the Context of the Public Governance Digital Transformation in Russia. Institute of Scientific Communications Conference, 1293–1301.

Waddington, H., Sonnenfeld, A., Finetti, J., Gaarder, M., John, D., & Stevenson, J. (2019). Citizen engagement in public services in low‐and middle‐income countries: A mixed‐methods systematic review of participation, inclusion, transparency and accountability (PITA) initiatives. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(1–2), e1025.

Yue, A., Nekmat, E., & Beta, A. R. (2019). Digital literacy through digital citizenship: Online civic participation and public opinion evaluation of youth minorities in Southeast Asia. Media and Communication, 7(2), 100–114.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Amelia, R. (2026). Evaluating the Impact of Digital Transformation Policies on Transparency and Accountability in Public Governance. Inspirasi & Strategi (INSPIRAT): Jurnal Kebijakan Publik & Bisnis, 16(2), 67–76. Retrieved from https://ejournal.isha.or.id/index.php/Inspirat/article/view/525