Equity by design: a rule-based framework for scholarship selection using the simple additive weighting method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/mandiri.v14i1.433Keywords:
Decision Support System, Scholarship, SAW Method, VB.NET, Web-based Decision MakingAbstract
This study presents the development of a decision support system designed to enhance the transparency and efficiency of scholarship recipient selection at Universitas Tama Jagakarsa. Utilizing the Simple Additive Weighting method, the system integrates key eligibility criteria—grade point average, parental income, and number of dependents—to compute preference scores that inform decision-making. The system was implemented using VB.NET and MySQL, following a waterfall model for development. Functional testing through black-box methods confirmed the system’s operational reliability, while user validation indicated strong acceptance and usability. Results demonstrate that the SAW algorithm effectively ranks applicants based on predefined weights and normalizations, offering a more objective and scalable alternative to manual selection processes. The system’s ability to process multi-criteria inputs and generate transparent, reproducible outcomes is a substantial contribution to scholarship administration in higher education. Findings suggest that integrating decision models into administrative processes can mitigate biases and improve institutional accountability. However, the study is limited by its focus on quantitative criteria and the use of a single decision-making algorithm. Future work should incorporate qualitative factors and assess alternative methods. The study affirms the potential of data-driven tools to support equitable access to educational opportunities, particularly for students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds.
References
Agustina, Y., & Nurcahyo, W. (2014). Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Berbasis WEB Buku Kas Umum Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah (SKPD). Jurnal Liquidity, 3(1), 1–10.
Arifitama, B. (2022). Decision support system scholarship selection using simple additive weighting (saw) method. Jisa(jurnal Informatika Dan Sains, 5(1), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.31326/jisa.v5i1.1279
Asafalex, A., Firmansyah, M., Darwis, M., & SW, I. (2022). Selection of candidates for academic scholarships using analytical hierarchy process (ahp) and simple additive weighting (saw) methods at national university. Jurnal Teknik Informatika, 15(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.15408/jti.v15i1.24780
Aziz, T., Sulistiyono, S., Harsiti, H., Setyawan, A., Suhendar, A., & Munandar, T. (2020). Group decision support system for employee performance evaluation using combined simple additive weighting and borda. Iop Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, 830(3), 032014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/830/3/032014
Barrera‐Osorio, F., Barros, A., & Filmer, D. (2023). Long‐term impacts of primary school scholarships: Evidence from cambodia. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 43(1), 10–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22533
Bi, T., & Han, J. (2013). Strategies to improve the level of educational technology. 2013 International Conference on Information Technology and Applications, 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITA.2013.45
Cui, R., Felix, N., Zou, F., Liu, F., & Han, Y. (2023). Impact of modern educational technology on students’. In Performance and perceptions based on “wisdom classroom” (pp. 134–139). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-158-6_19
Dhabe, P., S, P., A., D., L, D., B.V, B., & Abhyankar, H. (2010). Articulated entity relationship (aer) diagram for complete automation of relational database normalization. International Journal of Database Management Systems, 2(2), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijdms.2010.2206
Firdhayanti, A., Taufik, T., & Bachry, B. (2023). User acceptance testing through blackbox evaluation for corn distribution information system. Bit-Tech, 6(2), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.32877/bt.v6i2.1065
Gosain, K. (2024). A study on understanding the mediation of web 3.0 technologies in the teaching-learning process and its effect on the student’s achievement. Int Res J Adv Engg Mgt, 2(04), 948–956. https://doi.org/10.47392/irjaem.2024.0126
Hartono, R., Denny, Y., Ramdani, S., & Assaat, L. (2023). Development of used cooking oil circulation reactor for biodiesel production as learning media of vocational mechanical engineering student. International Journal of Stem Education for Sustainability, 3(1), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v3i1.161
Hutama, A. (2023). Simple additive weighting (saw) method to provide recommendations for selection of graphic processing unit (gpu. Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 101–106. https://doi.org/10.35134/jcsitech.v9i2.71
Jamian, M., Jalil, H. A., & Krauss, S. E. (2018). Ecological perspectives of ict affordances in malaysian higher education learning environment. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies, 3(7), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.21834/aje-bs.v3i7.260
Karuru, P., Suwarni, S., & Saddhono, K. (2023). Decision support systems in education: A revolutionary approach to teaching and learning. Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(4), 5015–5022. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.4360
Kholifaturrahman, M., Rachmatullah, S., & Said, B. (2023). Decision support system for single tuition scholarship awardees in higher education using mamdani fuzzy inference. J. Inf. Technol. Cyber Secur, 1(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.30996/jitcs.10009
Kline, J., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2020). Project management competencies of educational technology professionals in higher education: A qualitative analysis of the knowledge, skills, and abilities. JAID, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.51869/93jkskadr
Kuswanto, J. (2023). Implementasi metode simple additive weighting untuk seleksi penerimaan beasiswa. Bulletin of Computer Science Research, 3(2), 204–207. https://doi.org/10.47065/bulletincsr.v3i2.230
Lai, X. (2024). Research and practice of online postgraduate quality management systems in local institutions with the context of digital network. Jes, 20(2), 1117–1127. https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.1300
Lortkipanidze, N., & Otkhozoria, N. (2024). Navigating business excellence: The crucial role of information technology service management through best practice itil. Georgian Scientists. https://doi.org/10.52340/gs.2024.06.01.15
Ma, H. (2018). Analysis of expert system investment technology based on software sector. Proceedings of the 2018 8th International Conference on Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (ICASET 2018). 8th International Conference on Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (ICASET 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/icaset-18.2018.26
Midodashvili, B., Midodashvili, L., & Midodashvili, P. (2020). Educational programs performance ranking by use of topsis method. Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi, 1(47), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.17498/kdeniz.786051
Millet, I., & Nelson, R. (2007). Data flow diagrams vs. Use cases – student perceptions. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 3(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.4018/jicte.2007010107
Mundzir, M., Zulkarnain, R., & Hardi, R. (2023). Employing fuzzy ahp in modeling a decision support system for determining scholarship recipients within the university context. Jurnal Malikussaleh Mengabdi, 2(2), 344. https://doi.org/10.29103/jmm.v2i2.13344
Paudel, T., & Adhikari, G. (2024). Government incentives for schooling girls from slum families at community schools and their academic activities. Pragyaratna, 6(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.3126/pragyaratna.v6i1.64529
Pratama, H., Azman, M., Vafazov, F., & Wijaya, H. (2022). Development of augmented reality as a learning medium for recognition of layers and structures of the earth. Challenges of Science, V, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.31643/2022.06
Rahman, A. (2024). It project management frameworks: Evaluating best practices and methodologies for successful it project management. AJSTEME, 1(01), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.69593/ajaimldsmis.v1i01.128
Santosa, I., & Mulyana, R. (2023). The it services management architecture design for large and medium-sized companies based on itil 4 and togaf framework. Joiv International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 7(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.7.1.1590
Sari, D., Arifin, N., & Yusuf, A. (2022). Implementation of decision support system for scholarship recipients at bank indonesia. Ceddi Journal of Education, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.56134/cje.v1i1.10
Sihombing, V., Siregar, V., Tampubolon, W., Jannah, M., & Hakim, A. (2021). Implementation of simple additive weighting algorithm in decision support system. Iop Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, 1088(1), 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1088/1/012014
Sunarjo, R., Chakim, M., Maulana, S., & Fitriani, G. (2024). Management of educational institutions through information systems for enhanced efficiency and decision-making. International Transactions on Education Technology (Itee, 3(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.33050/itee.v3i1.670
Sutrisno, S., Kuraesin, A., Siminto, S., Irawansyah, I., & Ausat, A. (2023). The role of information technology in driving innovation and entrepreneurial business growth. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 12(1), 586–597. https://doi.org/10.33395/jmp.v12i1.12463
Swastyastu, C., Shanty, R., Sari, R., & Wikanningrum, A. (2024). Agile implementation for inventory (case study: Business unit of private university. J. Inf. Technol. Cyber Secur, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30996/jitcs.10060
Tulus, B., & Tanaamah, A. (2023). Design of information technology governance in educational institutions using cobit 2019 framework. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 5(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v5i1.408
Turban, E., Aronson, J. E., & Liang, T.-P. (2011). Decision Support System and Intelligence System (7th ed.). Prentice Education International.
Uriawan, W., Ramadhan, F., Azhar, H., Hasna, D., & Argani, F. (2023). Zakat al fitr management and information system using agile software development lifecycle. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202307.1697.v1
Wiwik, L., Dwiningrum, S., & Sujarwo, S. (2023). Decision support systems a game changer in the field of education. Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.4245
Zlaugotne, B., Žihare, L., Balode, L., Kalnbaļķīte, A., Khabdullin, A., & Blumberga, D. (2020). Multi-criteria decision analysis methods comparison. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 24(1), 454–471. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0028
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Widyat Nurcahyo, Nur Auliamiliyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
