Hybrid CRITIC–VIKOR method for objective-based component selection in ICT infrastructure planning for university laboratory systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/mandiri.v14i1.415Kata Kunci:
CRITIC, Hardware Material Selection, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Objective-Based, VIKORAbstrak
Selecting appropriate hardware materials is a critical aspect in planning computer laboratory infrastructure at higher education institutions, aiming to support effective technology-based learning. This study aims to evaluate and identify the optimal hardware material alternatives by applying an integrated CRITIC–VIKOR approach to multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). The CRITIC method is employed to determine objective weights for each criterion based on standard deviation and inter-criteria correlation, while the VIKOR method is used to rank the alternatives through a compromise solution approach. Nine hardware material alternatives including types of casings, cooling systems, and cables were assessed against five key criteria: cost, durability, energy efficiency, compatibility, and availability. The analysis results show that Energy Efficiency had the highest objective weight (0,260563785), followed by Durability (0,234238828) and Availability (0,211419693). Based on the compromise index (Q), the best alternatives in each category were Steel Casing (Q = 0,059737547), Liquid Cooler (Q = 0,350101862), and Braided Cable (Q = 0.0000). These findings demonstrate that the integrated CRITIC–VIKOR method effectively produces objective and balanced evaluations. This model may serve as a strategic decision-making tool for higher education institutions in the procurement of computer laboratory hardware based on data-driven considerations.
Referensi
Alimardani, M., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Aghdaie, M. H., & Tamošaitiene, J. (2013). A novel hybrid SWARA and VIKOR methodology for supplier selection in an agile environment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(3), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2013.814606
Anam, M. K., Yunianta, A., Alyamani, H. J., Erlin, Zamsuri, A., & Firdaus, M. B. (2023). Analysis and Identification of Non-Impact Factors in Smart City Readiness Using Technology Acceptance Analysis: a Case Study in Kampar District, Indonesia. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science, 5(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v5i1.2401
Arivendan, A., Chen, X., Zhang, Y. F., & Gao, W. (2025). Assessing the structural, mechanical, and thermal performance of Linum usitatissimum/carbon fiber composites by using novel WASPAS and CRITIC methods. Industrial Crops and Products, 224(October 2024), 120378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.120378
Chaturvedi, S., Bhatt, N., Shah, V., Jodhani, K. H., Patel, D., & Singh, S. K. (2025). Landfill site selection in hilly terrains: An integrated RS-GIS approach with AHP and VIKOR. Waste Management Bulletin.
Christanto, S., Runtuk, J. K., & Ng, P. K. (2025). Optimizing Supplier Selection: A Comparative Study of Fuzzy Vikor and Fuzzy Moora for Performance-Based Decision Making. IEEE Access.
Fu, H. P., Chu, K. K., Chao, P., Lee, H. H., & Liao, Y. C. (2011). Using fuzzy AHP and VIKOR for benchmarking analysis in the hotel industry. Service Industries Journal, 31(14), 2373–2389. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2010.503874
Fu, Y., Qin, Y., Kou, L., Liu, X., & Jia, L. (2021). Operational risk assessment of railway train based on type-2 intuitionistic fuzzy set and dynamic VIKOR approach. Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, 13(10), 1025–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2019.1597002
Gul, M. (2020). Application of Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methods in occupational health and safety risk assessment: the case of a gun and rifle barrel external surface oxidation and colouring unit. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 26(4), 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1492251
Gupta, H., & Barua, M. K. (2018). A novel hybrid multi-criteria method for supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of innovation ability. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 21(3), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2017.1382457
Gupta, S., Vijayvargy, L., & Gupta, K. (2021). Assessment of stress level in urban area’s during COVID-19 outbreak using critic and topsis: A case of Indian cities. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 24(2), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2021.1879470
Karami, S., Ghasemy Yaghin, R., & Mousazadegan, F. (2021). Supplier selection and evaluation in the garment supply chain: an integrated DEA–PCA–VIKOR approach. Journal of the Textile Institute, 112(4), 578–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2020.1768771
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2017). Assessment of third-party logistics providers using a CRITIC–WASPAS approach with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Transport, 32(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2017.1282381
Leng, J., Jiang, P., & Ding, K. (2014). Implementing of a three-phase integrated decision support model for parts machining outsourcing. International Journal of Production Research, 52(12), 3614–3636. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.879344
Maidin, S. S., Yahya, N., Fauzi, M. A. B. F., & Bakar, N. S. A. A. (2025). Current and Future Trends for Sustainable Software Development: Software Security in Agile and Hybrid Agile through Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Applied Data Sciences, 6(1), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v6i1.473
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Zakuan, N., Valipour, A., & Kazemilari, M. (2016). Proposing a new hierarchical framework for the evaluation of quality management practices: a new combined fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2015.1061589
Maulana, A., Datau, S., & Ali, A. N. (2021). Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Metode Simple Additive Weighting pada Pemilihan Merk Personal Komputer di Laboratorium PPL SMKN 1 Garut. Jurnal Algoritma, 18(2), 433–443.
Noptrina, N., Pramuntadi, A., Wijaya, D. P., & Prastowo, W. D. (2024). Perancangan Sistem Penjadwalan Praktikum Menggunakan Algoritma FIFO (First In First Out) Berbasis Website. Jurnal Informatika Teknologi Dan Sains (JINTEKS), 6(2), 375–385.
Rade Nugraha, Adia Rindani, & Syafaatul Habib. (2025). Optimizing the Management of Educational Facilities and Infrastructure Based on Islamic Values. Al Yazidiy Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 7(1), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.55606/ay.v7i1.1362
Radwan, N. M., Elstohy, R., & Hanna, W. K. (2021). A Proposed Method for Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making: An Application to Site Selection. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 35(7), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2021.1901031
Seikh, M. R., & Dey, A. (2025). Triangular divergence-based VIKOR method applied in a q-Rung orthopair fuzzy setting for health insurance plan selection. Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications, 6(2), 300–317.
Setyaedhi, H. S. (2021). Peranan Media Pembelajaran Dalam Kurikulum 2013. Educational Technology Journal, 1(1), 19–30.
Sugiarti, S., Gaffar, A. W. M., Suallis, S., & Samsul, S. W. (2025). Sistem Rekomendasi Pemilihan Hardware Komputer Menggunakan Metode Item-Based Collaborative Filtering. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 14(1), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.33395/jmp.v14i1.14713
Wei, G., Lei, F., Lin, R., Wang, R., Wei, Y., Wu, J., & Wei, C. (2020). Algorithms for probabilistic uncertain linguistic multiple attribute group decision making based on the GRA and CRITIC method: application to location planning of electric vehicle charging stations. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 33(1), 828–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1734851
Wu, S. M., Liu, H. C., & Wang, L. E. (2017). Hesitant fuzzy integrated MCDM approach for quality function deployment: a case study in electric vehicle. International Journal of Production Research, 55(15), 4436–4449. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1259670
Xu, T., Liu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Simplified likelihood estimation of ship total loss using GRA and CRITIC methods. Transportation Planning and Technology, 43(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2020.1717147
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Merina Pratiwi, Amiroel Oemara Syarief
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
