Comparisonal Analysis Of Incremental Conductance And Perturb And Observe Methods As MPPT Algorithm In Photovoltaic System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/mekintek.v12i1.23Keywords:
Incremental Conductance, Observe Methods, Algorithm In Photoboltaic SystemAbstract
Photovoltaic is a semiconductor device that utilizes photon energy from the sun to be converted into electrical energy. The electrical energy produced by photovoltaic is optimized by a system called Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT). MPPT will find the optimal working point of the photovoltaic and keep it always working at that point. In this study, the methods used to find the optimal work point are Incremental Conductance and Perturb and Observe. MPPT is connected to the Boost Converter as a photovoltaic voltage controller. The analysis of the two MPPT methods was carried out through simulation in MATLAB/Simulink. The photovoltaic model is designed with reference to the KS80M-36 photovoltaic model. The MPPT system that has been designed is then simulated and its performance is seen. The MPPT system that has been designed using the Incremental Conductance algorithm and the Perturb and Observe algorithm has succeeded in finding the optimal photovoltaic working point and is able to respond to changes in environmental conditions by finding new optimal working points. The two MPPT systems are also able to make photovoltaic work at that optimal point. The Incremental Conductance algorithm has a power ratio of 96%, while the Perturb and Observe algorithm has a power ratio of 95.4%. The MPPT system that has been designed using the Incremental Conductance algorithm and the Perturb and Observe algorithm has succeeded in finding the optimal photovoltaic working point and is able to respond to changes in environmental conditions by finding new optimal working points. The two MPPT systems are also able to make photovoltaic work at that optimal point. The Incremental Conductance algorithm has a power ratio of 96%, while the Perturb and Observe algorithm has a power ratio of 95.4%.
References
Hegedus, S., & Luque, A. (2003). Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Tsai, H.-L., Tu, C.-S., & Su, Y.-J. (2008). Development of Generalized Photovoltaic Model Using MATLAB/SIMULINK. WCECS.
Babgei A. F., 2012, Rancang Bangun Maximum Power Point Tracker (MPPT) pada Panel Surya Dengan menggunakan metode Fuzzy, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November, Surabaya.
Widodo, Rusminto T., Rugianto, Asmuniv, Sejati, Purnomo, "Maximum Power Point Tracker Sel Surya Menggunakan Algoritma Perturb And Observe", Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya-ITS, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Schmid, J., & Schmidt, H. (2003). Power Conditioning for Photovoltaic Power Systems. In Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering (pp. 863- 903).John Wiley & Sons, LTD.
Esram, T., & Chapman, P. L. (2007). Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques. Energy Conversion, IEEE Transactions on , 22 (2), 439 – 449.
Hart, D. W. (1997). Introduction to Power Electronics. New Jersey: Prentics-Hall.
Athimulam Kalirasu, Subharensu Sekar Dash, “Simulation of Closed Loop Controlled Boost Converter for Solar Installation”, Serbian Journal of Electrical Engineering Vol. 7, No. 1, May 2010, 121-130.
Lin, L. K. (2009). A Hybrid Wind/Solar Energy Converter. SIM University.
Ananduta, Wayan Wicak (2011). Simulasi dan Analisis Sistem Maximum Power Point Tracker Berbasis Rangkaian Boost Converter. UI, Depok, Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Taufik Alfajri Zulhelmi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

