Optimizing Tile Selection: Integrating Feasibility Evaluation in a Decision Support System using Analytical Hierarchy Process
Keywords:
Analytical Hierarchy Process, Construction and Design, Decision Support System, Feasibility Evaluation, Tile SelectionAbstract
Tile selection in construction and design projects necessitates a holistic evaluation encompassing aesthetic, functional, and practical feasibility aspects. This research investigates and presents a Decision Support System (DSS) integrating the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) with an innovative incorporation of feasibility evaluation for comprehensive tile selection. The research undertakes a systematic exploration of criteria paramount in tile selection, identifying durability, cost, aesthetics, and feasibility considerations as pivotal facets. The AHP methodology forms the backbone of the developed DSS, quantifying stakeholders' preferences, and weighing criteria to facilitate structured decision-making. A distinctive feature of the developed DSS lies in the seamless integration of feasibility evaluation. The system evaluates tiles not solely based on aesthetic appeal or functional attributes but encompasses practical aspects such as installation ease, maintenance requirements, and sustainability considerations. The effectiveness and efficiency of the DSS are highlighted through empirical application, showcasing its ability to streamline decision-making processes. The developed DSS emerges as a transformative tool, advocating for structured, informed, and sustainable decision-making in tile selection processes. Its potential impact spans industries, elevating standards and influencing best practices in decision-making across construction and design domains.
References
Abastante, F., Corrente, S., Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., & Lami, I. M. (2019). A new parsimonious AHP methodology: Assigning priorities to many objects by comparing pairwise few reference objects. Expert Systems with Applications, 127, 109–120.
Alsharif, M. H., Nordin, R., & Ismail, M. (2015). Energy optimisation of hybrid off-grid system for remote telecommunication base station deployment in Malaysia. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2015, 1–15.
Azhar, N. A., Radzi, N. A. M., & Wan Ahmad, W. S. H. M. (2021). Multi-criteria decision making: a systematic review. Recent Advances in Electrical & Electronic Engineering (Formerly Recent Patents on Electrical & Electronic Engineering), 14(8), 779–801.
Barros, G. A. B. (2018). Adventures in Data-driven Game Content Generation. New York University Tandon School of Engineering.
Bechthold, M., Kane, A., & King, N. (2015). Ceramic Material Systems: in architecture and interior design. Birkhäuser.
Büyüközkan, G. (2004). Multi‐criteria decision making for e‐marketplace selection. Internet Research, 14(2), 139–154.
Campbell, S. B., Shaw, D. S., & Gilliom, M. (2000). Early externalizing behavior problems: Toddlers and preschoolers at risk for later maladjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 12(3), 467–488.
Davies, M. (2001). Adaptive AHP: a review of marketing applications with extensions. European Journal of Marketing, 35(7/8), 872–894.
Desai, S., Bidanda, B., & Lovell, M. R. (2012). Material and process selection in product design using decision-making technique (AHP). European Journal of Industrial Engineering, 6(3), 322–346.
Gangwar, H., Date, H., & Ramaswamy, R. (2015). Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(1), 107–130.
Grievson, O., Holloway, T., & Johnson, B. (2022). A Strategic Digital Transformation for the Water Industry. IWA Publishing.
Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods. John Wiley & Sons.
Hujainah, F., Bakar, R. B. A., Abdulgabber, M. A., & Zamli, K. Z. (2018). Software requirements prioritisation: a systematic literature review on significance, stakeholders, techniques and challenges. IEEE Access, 6, 71497–71523.
Israel, M., Wherfel, Q. M., Pearson, J., Shehab, S., & Tapia, T. (2015). Empowering K–12 students with disabilities to learn computational thinking and computer programming. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 48(1), 45–53.
Jessen, F., Amariglio, R. E., Van Boxtel, M., Breteler, M., Ceccaldi, M., Chételat, G., Dubois, B., Dufouil, C., Ellis, K. A., & Van Der Flier, W. M. (2014). A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 10(6), 844–852.
LaBoda, C., Duschl, H., & Dwyer, C. L. (2014). DNA-enabled integrated molecular systems for computation and sensing. Accounts of Chemical Research, 47(6), 1816–1824.
Lepri, B., Oliver, N., Letouzé, E., Pentland, A., & Vinck, P. (2018). Fair, transparent, and accountable algorithmic decision-making processes: The premise, the proposed solutions, and the open challenges. Philosophy & Technology, 31, 611–627.
Li, X., Li, C., Rahaman, M. M., Sun, H., Li, X., Wu, J., Yao, Y., & Grzegorzek, M. (2022). A comprehensive review of computer-aided whole-slide image analysis: from datasets to feature extraction, segmentation, classification and detection approaches. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(6), 4809–4878.
Liu, Y., Eckert, C. M., & Earl, C. (2020). A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Systems with Applications, 161, 113738.
Massam, B. H. (1988). Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques in planning. Progress in Planning, 30, 1–84.
Mir, S. A., & Padma, T. (2017). Fuzzy decision support system for evaluation and prioritisation of critical success factors for the development of agricultural DSS. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 7(2), 146–172.
Murali, S., & Pugazhendhi, S. (2016). An integrated model to identify and rank the after sales service strategies of firms engaged in household appliances business. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 24(1), 99–124.
Nwodo, M. N., & Anumba, C. J. (2019). A review of life cycle assessment of buildings using a systematic approach. Building and Environment, 162, 106290.
Paul, M., Negahban-Azar, M., Shirmohammadi, A., & Montas, H. (2020). Assessment of agricultural land suitability for irrigation with reclaimed water using geospatial multi-criteria decision analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 231, 105987.
Sermet, Y., Demir, I., & Muste, M. (2020). A serious gaming framework for decision support on hydrological hazards. Science of The Total Environment, 728, 138895.
Singh, K. (2021). Intelligent decision support system for selection of Learning Apps to promote critical thinking in first year programming students.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Edward Joyce, Hsinchun Chen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
