Improvement Of Working Facilities At The Zinc Tile Printing Station With Ergonomic Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/mekintek.v13i1.34Keywords:
Standard Nordic Questionnaire (SNQ), Quality Function Deployment (QFD), AnthropometryAbstract
PT. Bintang Rezeki Maju is a private company engaged in the manufacture of zinc roof tiles. The process of making zinc tile starts from printing, coloring, polishing and drying. Observations focused on the printing station because the printing station has a very important role in the zinc tile production process because it directly affects the quality of the tiles produced. The results of the study obtained a new work facility design with dimensions according to the anthropometry of the workers with specifications of chair leg height 45.14 cm, seat length 45.59 cm, seat seat width 32.51 cm, seat back height 58.26 cm, width seat backrest 41.66 cm and machine leg height 68.41 cm. With the new work facility improvement design, it can reduce operator complaints at the printing station. Anthropometric approach aims to obtain the appropriate dimensions of the operator's body for the design of work facilities. The results of the study obtained a new work facility design with dimensions according to the anthropometry of the workers with specifications of chair leg height 45.14 cm, seat length 45.59 cm, seat seat width 32.51 cm, seat back height 58.26 cm, width seat backrest is 41.66 cm and machine leg height is 68.41 cm. With the new work facility improvement design, it can reduce operator complaints at the printing station. Anthropometric approach aims to obtain the appropriate dimensions of the operator's body for the design of work facilities. The results of the study obtained a new work facility design with dimensions according to the anthropometry of the workers with specifications of chair leg height 45.14 cm, seat length 45.59 cm, seat seat width 32.51 cm, seat back height 58.26 cm, width seat backrest 41.66 cm and machine leg height 68.41 cm. With the new work facility improvement design, it can reduce operator complaints at the printing station. the height of the backrest is 58.26 cm, the width of the backrest is 41.66 cm and the height of the machine leg is 68.41 cm. With the new work facility improvement design, it can reduce operator complaints at the printing station. the height of the backrest is 58.26 cm, the width of the backrest is 41.66 cm and the height of the machine leg is 68.41 cm. With the new work facility improvement design, it can reduce operator complaints at the printing station.
References
Barroso, M. P., Arezes, P. M., da Costa, L. G., & Miguel, A. S. (2005). Anthropometric study of Portuguese workers. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35(5), 401–410.
Bouchereau, V., & Rowlands, H. (2000). Methods and techniques to help quality function deployment (QFD). Benchmarking: An International Journal, 7(1), 8–20.
Dang, M.-Q. (2017). Potential of solar energy in Indonesia. Solar Energy in Indonesia, 7, 0–26.
Dianat, I., Molenbroek, J., & Castellucci, H. I. (2018). A review of the methodology and applications of anthropometry in ergonomics and product design. Ergonomics, 61(12), 1696–1720.
Eston, R., Hawes, M., Martin, A., & Reilly, T. (2009). Human body composition. In Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology laboratory manual: Tests, procedures and data (pp. 27–77). Routledge.
Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. de F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 4.0-a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609–3629.
Maxwell, S. E., Delaney, H. D., & Kelley, K. (2017). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Routledge.
Mitra, A. (2016). Fundamentals of quality control and improvement. John Wiley & Sons.
Namnik, N., Negahban, H., Salehi, R., Shafizadeh, R., & Tabib, M. S. (2016). Validity and reliability of Persian version of the Specific Nordic questionnaire in Iranian industrial workers. Work, 54(1), 35–41.
Ottonello, M., Benevolo, E., & Zsirai, E. (2002). Nursing care in rehabilitation units: a new questionnaire to determine patient satisfaction. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 38(4), 179.
Pheasant, S., & Haslegrave, C. M. (2018). Bodyspace: Anthropometry, ergonomics and the design of work. CRC press.
Pope, M. H., Goh, K. L., & Magnusson, M. L. (2002). Spine ergonomics. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 4(1), 49–68.
Schonberger, R. J. (2008). World class manufacturing. Simon and Schuster.
Stein, J. A. (2017). Hot metal: Material culture and tangible labour. In Hot metal. Manchester University Press.
Tambunan, M. M., Napitupulu, H. L., Rizkya, I., & Syahputri, K. (2020). Design of work facilities using quality function deployment (QFD) and macro ergonomic analysis design (MEAD). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 801(1), 12119.
Wiggermann, N., Bradtmiller, B., Bunnell, S., Hildebrand, C., Archibeque, J., Ebert, S., Reed, M. P., & Jones, M. L. H. (2019). Anthropometric dimensions of individuals with high body mass index. Human Factors, 61(8), 1277–1296.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 M. Rizky Multazam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
