Comparison Analysis Of Cost And Time In Situ Concrete Implementation Method With Pre Cast
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/mekintek.v11i2.13Keywords:
Abutments, In Situ, Pre Cast, Cost, TimeAbstract
In the implementation of construction projects, there are several methods of concrete implementation used, such as in situ concrete which is carried out in the implementation of casting at the project site so that it takes a long time and quite a lot of formwork. In addition, there is also a method of implementing pre-cast concrete which is basically the same as conventional concrete, but the production process is carried out in a special place for pre-cast production and then brought to the project site and installed into concrete to form a unified structure. So it doesn't take too long and is considered more efficient. This study aims to compare the cost and time of implementing in situ and pre-cast concrete methods on one of the bridge abutments of the Kuala Tanjung Multi Purpose Terminal Project using the data obtained in the form of image data, material prices, wages and equipment. And from the results of the calculation analysis, the results of the method of implementing concrete on one of the bridge abutments are that with in situ concrete it takes 7 days to implement with a total cost of Rp. 807,867,550, - and with pre cast concrete it takes 5 days to implement total cost Rp.612,345,190,-. So from this study, it was found that the comparison method for the implementation of pre-cast concrete was more efficient with a cheaper price comparison of Rp. 195.552.360, - and 2 days faster time for the work of one bridge abutment.
References
Annisa, Widya. 2013. Perbandingan Metode Precast dengan Metode Konvensional Ditinjau Berdasarkan Perencanaan Biaya dan Waktu pada Gedung Administrasi Proyek Fasilitas Penunjang Bandara Kuala Namu. Politeknik Negeri Medan .
Ashworth, Allan. 1988. Perencanaan Biaya Bangunan. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia Pustaka Umum.
Cahyono, Fajar. 2010. Study Perbandingan Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Metode Pelaksanaan Precast dengan Metode Konvensional Dilihat dari Segi Waktu dan Biaya. Univeristas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Elly T. dan F.X. Supartono. 2000. Kecenderungan Industri Konstruksi Indonesia Masa Depan Dengan Pengembangan Sistem Elemen Pracetak. Jakarta.
Fani, F., dkk. 2012. Analisa Perbandingan Metode Pelaksanaan Cast In Situ dengan Pra Cetak Terhadap Biaya dan Waktu pada Proyek Dian Regency Apartemen. Vol1. No.1 (1-6), 2012.
Ibrahim H. B.2001. Rencana dan Estimate Real of Cost. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Khusnidzar A. dan M.Harry F. 2010. Tugas Akhir Program Analisa Kestabilan Abutment.Semarang.
Najoan, H.C., dkk. 2016. Analisis Metode Pelaksanaan Pelat Precast dan Pelat Konvensional Ditinjau dari Waktu dan Biaya (Studi Kasus: Markas Komando dan Daerah Militer Manado). Vol.4 No. 5 (319-327), Mei 2016.
Purwaningsih, I. dkk.2014. Perbandingan Biaya dan Waktu pada Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Konstruksi Dengan Beton Konvensional dan Fly Slab (Studi Kasus: Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Politeknik madiun). Vol. 3 No. 4 (850-860), 2014.
R.terr, George dan Leslie W.Rue. 2010. Dasar-Dasar Manajamen. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Soeharto, Imam. 1999. Manajemen Proyek : Dari Konseptual Sampai Operasional. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Wulfram, I. Ervianto. 2006. Eksplorasi Konstruksi Dalam Proyek Konstuksi.Yogyakarta : Andi Offset.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Andrew Samuel Erionkita Purba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.